Broadcom Corp. v. Emulex Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
732 F.3d 1325 · 2013
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 35 U.S.C. § 103 · 35 U.S.C. § 154
Relies on Graham v. John Deere Company of Kansas City Calmar Inc · Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · eBay Inc. v. MERCEXCHANGE, LL · Phillips v. AWH Corp. · Bell Communications Research, Inc. v. Vitalink Communications Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well settled that an accused device that sometimes, but not always, embodies a claim[ ] nonetheless infringes.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.