Bradberry v. Jefferson County’s Empirical Analysis
732 F.3d 540 · 2013
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Louisiana Eastern District Court)
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 38 U.S.C. § 4301 · 38 U.S.C. § 4302 · 38 U.S.C. § 4311 · 38 U.S.C. § 4312
Relies on Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · National Labor Relations Board v. Transportation Management Corp. · City of Chicago v. International College of Surgeons · Michigan v. Bryant · Staub v. Proctor Hospital
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The F-5 Report becomes part of the officer's permanent TCLEOSE record. If the officer seeks employment with another law enforcement agency, the agency is required to review employment termination reports before hiring the officer.” Id. (quoting 37 Tex. Admin. Code § 217.7 (a)(1)). . Section 554.003 of the Texas Government Code allows public employees in whistleblower actions to sue for injunctive relief, actual damages, court costs, and reasonable attorney’s fees. Section 37,001 of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code applies to declaratory judgment actions brought under Texas law. Section 37.009 of the Texas Declaratory Judgment Act authorizes courts in declaratory judgment actions to "award costs and reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees as are equitable and just.” . The court uses the term "order”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) to encourage noncareer service in the uniformed services by reducing employment disadvantages; (2) to minimize the disruption to the lives of persons performing military service, their employers and others by providing for the prompt reemployment of such persons upon their completion of such service; and (3) to prohibit discrimination against persons because of their service in the uniformed services.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“offensive use of collateral estoppel occurs when the plaintiff seeks to foreclose the defendant from litigating an issue the defendant has previously litigated unsuccessfully in an action with another party.” Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322 , 326 n. 4, 99 S.Ct. 645 , 58 L.Ed.2d 552 (1979) (emphasis added). As the parties in the case before this Court are identical, the issue of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.