Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 732 F.3d 702 - Schomas v. Colvin

Schomas v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis

732 F.3d 702 · 2013

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
March 2023
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Skarbek v. Barnhart · Villano v. Astrue · Terry v. Astrue · United States of America, v. David Lanzotti and Connie L. Hughes, · Frank v. Barnhart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f the ALJ disbelieved [the claimant], he needed to explain that finding in order to build a logical bridge between the evidence and his conclusion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.