Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 732 P2D 505 - State v. Hamilton

State v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
May 1999
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · Carnley v. Cochran · Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp. · Moore v. State of Michigan · Martin Theatres of Texas, Inc. v. Bullock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “record evidence supports the ruling of the trial court and the review of the district court that defendant waived his right to assistance of counsel”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “understood risks of declining legal counsel, was aware of the legal ramifications and technical rules applicable to his case, and knew that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “knows what he is doing and his choice is made with eyes open.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.