Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 732 P2D 548 - Smith v. Shortall

Smith v. Shortall’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 1992
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Atlantic Richfield Co. v. State · Suber v. Alaska State Bond Committee · Hull v. Alaska Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n · United States v. Tietje

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The obligation was evidenced by a promissory note and secured by a deed of trust. When [Debtor] defaulted on the obligation, [Creditor] had several options. She could have waived the security of the deed of trust and sued on the note. Or, she could have brought an action to judicially foreclose the deed of trust, retaining the right to recover a deficiency judgment. AS 09.45.170; Súber v. Alaska State Bond Committee, 414 P.2d 546, 555 (Alaska 1966). Instead, [Creditor] elected the remedy of non-judicial foreclosure. By electing this remedy, [Creditor] lost her right to recover a deficiency judgment against [Debt- or].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “When a sale is made by a trustee under a deed of trust, as authorized by AS 34.20.070— 34.20.130, no other or further action or proceeding may be taken nor judgment entered against the maker or the surety or guarantor of the maker, on the obligation secured by the deed of trust for a deficiency.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.