Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 732 SO2D 1092 - Cox v. CSX Intermodal, Inc.

Cox v. CSX Intermodal, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

92
cited by 92 later decisions
3
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably 760 So. 2d 126 - Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach (2000), Ernie Haire Ford Inc Auto Assets Trust Mary Haire Ernest Haire III v. Ford Motor Company (2001)

3 federal appellate · 53 state decisions

6101999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Gory Roofing Tile Manufacturing, Inc. v. Davison · Sons of Thunder, Inc. v. Borden, Inc. · 389 So. 2d 999 - Bishop v. Florida Specialty Paint Co. · Beck v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is designed to protect the contracting parties' reasonable expectations.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If the record reflects even the possibility of a material issue of fact, or if different inferences can be drawn reasonably from the facts, that doubt must be resolved against the moving party and summary judgment must be denied.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]hen the language of a contract does not deal in express terms with all aspects of the rights and duties of the parties to the agreement, the language used `should be interpreted as reasonable persons, knowledgable about the business or industry, would likely interpret them- not some strained interpretation put forth by the drafter.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.