732 So. 2d 1270 - State v. Lamb’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 712 So. 2d 62 - Aucoin v. State Through Dept. of Transp. and Dev. · 705 So. 2d 724 - Sudwischer v. Estate of Huffpauir · 426 So. 2d 140 - State v. Manuel · State v. Freeze · 520 So. 2d 336 - State v. Spooner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A judicial confession is a declaration made by a party in a judicial proceeding. That confession constitutes full proof against the party who made it.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the adverse party must have believed the fact was no longer at issue or must have relied on it, to his detriment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Personal effects shall never be taken. But the following property may be forfeited and disposed of in a civil proceeding, as provided by law: contraband drugs; property derived in whole or in part from contraband drugs; property used in the distribution, transfer, sale, felony possession, manufacture, or transportation of contraband drugs; property used or intended to be used to facilitate any of the above conduct; or other property because the above described property has been rendered unavailable. This section shall not apply to appropriation of property necessary for levee or levee drainage purposes. Article I Section 4.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Edwards
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.