732 So. 2d 761 - State v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 1999
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Chapman v. State of California · State v. Jacobs · 445 So. 2d 1198 - State v. Wright · State v. Shapiro
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the giving or offering to give, directly or indirectly, anything of apparent present or prospective value to any of the following persons, with the intent to influence his conduct in relation to his position, employment or duty: ... (d) Witness, or person about to be called as a witness, upon a trial or other proceeding before any court, board or officer authorized to hear evidence or to take testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“no appellate court in this state has determined that a... plea agreement is something of `apparent present or prospective value' and/or violates the public bribery statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.