Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 732 So. 2d 876 - Kilpatrick v. Kilpatrick

732 So. 2d 876 - Kilpatrick v. Kilpatrick’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

66 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably 824 So. 2d 623 - Sanderson v. Sanderson (2002), 25 So. 3d 274 - Lowrey v. Lowrey (2009)

66 state decisions

400199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 639 So. 2d 921 - Ferguson v. Ferguson · Armstrong v. Armstrong · 639 So. 2d 909 - Hemsley v. Hemsley · 650 So. 2d 1281 - Johnson v. Johnson · 610 So. 2d 348 - Tilley v. Tilley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This Court will not disturb the findings of a chancellor when supported by substantial evidence unless the chancellor abused his discretion, was manifestly wrong, clearly erroneous or an erroneous legal standard was applied.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Under the standard of review utilized to review a chancery court's findings of fact, particularly in the areas of divorce, alimony and child support, this Court will not overturn the court on appeal unless its findings were manifestly wrong.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]ithout findings from the Chancellor concerning this income or use of income, we cannot determine if the distribution of property outlined above meets the standards of equitable distribution required by Ferguson .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.