Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 732 So. 2d 937 - Turner v. State

732 So. 2d 937 - Turner v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 64 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably 805 So. 2d 452 - Simmons v. State (2001), 860 So. 2d 704 - Howell v. State (2003)

1 federal appellate · 64 state decisions

520199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Woodson v. North Carolina · Enmund v. Florida · Herrera v. Collins · Ross v. Moffitt · Clemons v. Mississippi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e construed our capital murder statute and held that "the underlying crime begins where an indictable attempt is reached...." An indictment charging a killing occurring "while engaged in the commission of' one of the enumerated felonies includes the actions of the defendant leading up to the felony, the attempted felony, and flight from the scene of the felony. The fact that the actual moment of the victim's death preceded consummation of the underlying felony does not vitiate the capital charge.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the State is allowed to rebut mitigating evidence through cross-examination, introduction of rebuttal evidence or by argument.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`[a] trial judge enjoys a great deal of discretion as to the relevancy and admissibility of evidence. Unless the judge abuses this discretion so as to be prejudicial to the accused, the Court will not reverse this ruling.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.