Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 732 SO2D 993 - Rice v. Sinkfield

Rice v. Sinkfield’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2005
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 13 U.S.C. § 141

Relies on Sibron v. State of New York Peters · United States v. W. T. Grant Co. · Sosna v. Iowa · Moore v. Ogilvie · City of Birmingham v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that plaintiffs' challenge to state election law was not moot, even after the challenged election was completed, because the plaintiffs could challenge the law with respect to future elections.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.