Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 733 F.2d 1356 - United States v. Clevenger

United States v. Clevenger’s Empirical Analysis

733 F.2d 1356 · 1984

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
July 2016
most recently cited

54 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably United States v. Disla (1986), United States v. Bibbero (1984)

54 federal appellate · 1 district ·

4701984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Gideon v. Wainwright · Ungar v. Sarafite · S.S. Zoe Colocotroni v. Puerto Rico · Geders v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “To establish fraud, the government must prove that the defendant possessed the requisite intent to defraud. The elements of fraud consist of: (1) a false representation, (2) in reference to a material fact, (3) made with knowledge of its falsity, (4) and with intent to deceive, (5) with action taken in reliance upon the representation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.