Medina v. Perez’s Empirical Analysis
733 F.2d 170 · 1984
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2015
5 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of Cleveland · Foremost Insurance v. Richardson · Gutierrez v. Waterman Steamship Corp. · Richards v. Blake Builders Supply Inc. · Ernest Wilmer Crosson, Iii, and Marie Louise Crosson, His Wife v. Maxwell Vance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he focus of Foremost was whether the wrong was related to 'traditional maritime activity,' and the Court made clear that the most fundamental of such activities is navigation of a vessel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hogan v. Overman“absolutely no connection to maritime activity,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hogan v. Overman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.