Fuentes v. Moran’s Empirical Analysis
733 F.2d 176 · 1984
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
5
states following
November 1993
most recently cited
5 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Escobedo v. Illinois · Rose v. Lundy · Rochin v. People of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The question of waiver must be decided based on “ ‘the particular facts and circumstances surrounding [this] case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.’ ” North Carolina v. Butler, 441 U.S. 369, 374-75 , 99 S.Ct. 1755, 1757-58 , 60 L.Ed.2d 286 (1979), (quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“interfere[nce] with the attorney-client relationship”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.