Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 733 F.2d 324 - Parris v. Heckler

Parris v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis

733 F.2d 324 · 1984

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
June 2008
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently June 2008 · most notably Mullen v. Bowen (1986), Craig v. Chater (1996)

33 federal appellate · 3 district ·

420198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act)

Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Richardson v. Perales · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Beavers v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare · Laffoon v. Califano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[p]ain is not disabling per se, and subjective evidence of pain cannot take precedence over objective medical evidence or the lack thereof.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he courts have defined 'substantial evidence' as 'such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The statutorily-mandated deference runs in favor of the Secretary and the Appeals Council, not the AU and the Appeals Council may reach conclusions differing from those of the AU ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.