Wright v. Anthony’s Empirical Analysis
733 F.2d 575 · 1984
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably United States v. Aceto Agricultural Chemicals Corp. (1989), Shero v. City of Grove (2007)
16 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Scheuer v. Rhodes · Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. · Havas v. Thornton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he [time, place and manner] restriction may be said to have served a significant governmental interest in conserving time and in ensuring that others had an opportunity to speak.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.