Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 733 F.2d 596 - United States v. Hoffman

United States v. Hoffman’s Empirical Analysis

733 F.2d 596 · 1984

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
10
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

38 federal appellate · 2 district · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Bonin v. Calderon (1995), Osborn v. Shillinger (1988)

38 federal appellate · 2 district · 21 state decisions — followed in 10 states

27019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Johnson v. Zerbst · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Chambers v. Maroney · Holloway v. Arkansas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an actual conflict of interest adversely affected [Bauer's] performance.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “actively represented conflicting interests.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We limit our decision in this case to situations where, unbeknown to the defendant, his representative was not authorized to practice law in any state, and the lack of such authorization stemmed from failure to seek it or from its denial for a reason going to legal ability, such as failure to pass a bar examination, or want of moral character.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.