Walker v. BuildDirect.com Technologies, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
733 F.3d 1001 · 2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 9 U.S.C. § 16 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. Dobson · Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Casarotto · At&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion · AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion · 132 S. Ct. 1201 - Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In particular, states 'may not ... decide that a contract is fair enough to enforce all its basic terms (price, service, credit), but not fair enough to enforce its arbitration clause.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“limits state-law grounds for refusing to enforce an arbitration clause.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'appl[ies] ordinary state-law principles that govern the formation of contracts to determine whether a party has agreed to arbitrate a dispute.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.