Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 733 F.3d 1006 - Pratt v. Petelin

Pratt v. Petelin’s Empirical Analysis

733 F.3d 1006 · 2013

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
August 2019
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Yates v. United States · Stromberg v. People of State of California · Griffin v. United States · Walther v. Lone Star Gas Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “review[s] de novo whether a district court's jury instructions correctly stated the governing law.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]hese cases address the situation where the jury may have based its verdict on an incorrect or entirely unsupported legal theory. They are thus distinguishable from the case at hand, where [the defendant] claims that some, but not all, of the factual bases presented to the jury for one legal theory-negligence-were unsupported by sufficient evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.