Batubara v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
733 F.3d 1040 · 2013
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Nahatchevska v. Ashcroft · Alibasic v. Mukasey · Del Pilar v. United States Attorney General · Padilla-Caldera v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The BIA then noted the record did not show if petitioners had timely posted the voluntary-departure bond, or if the IJ had advised petitioners they were required to submit proof of having posted this bond, as required by 8 C.F.R. § 1240.26 (c)(3). Thus, the BIA remanded for the IJ to provide all advisals that were required when he granted volun tary departure.... On remand, petitioners withdrew their requests for voluntary departure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hih v. Lynch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.