Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 733 F.3d 18 - Garuti v. Roden

Garuti v. Roden’s Empirical Analysis

733 F.3d 18 · 2013

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
August 2020
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Massachusetts District Court)

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2246 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2247 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division · Johnson v. Zerbst · Patterson v. New York · Speiser v. Randall

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.