Mills v. Calero

First Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 23, 2013.

First Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2013-10-23

2 counsel of record

Relies on District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 2013-10-23

¶1Joseph M. Baldacci on brief for appellant.

¶2 *29Thomas A. Knowlton on brief for appellees.

¶3Before LYNCH, Chief Judge, STAHL and HOWARD, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5We have carefully reviewed the briefs on appeal and considered the appellant’s arguments. The district court was plainly correct to dismiss the complaint. Mills’s arguments are based on a misapprehension of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, see D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983), and of issue preclusion, and are without merit. For the reasons set forth in the district court’s order, Mills v. Calero, No. 1:11-cv-00470 (D.Me. Mar. 7, 2013), we summarily affirm. See 1st Cir. R. 27.0(c).