Ward v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
733 F.3d 601 · 2013
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1361 (§ 291 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura · Addington v. Texas · Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion · United States v. Timmreck · Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the [government] has the burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that, in the case of an alien who has been admitted to the United States, the alien is deportable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rosa v. Bondi“[t]he term 'unequivocal,' taken by itself, means proof that admits of no doubt, a burden approximating, if not exceeding, that used in criminal cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rosa v. Bondi“[t]he 'clear, unequivocal, and convincing standard' is a more demanding degree of proof than the 'clear and convincing' standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rosa v. Bondi
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.