United States v. Steele’s Empirical Analysis
733 F.3d 894 · 2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1512 · 18 U.S.C. § 1958 · 18 U.S.C. § 844 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on United States of America v. Pablo Rivera-Sanchez · United States v. Ross · United States v. Miskinis · Miller v. Hambrick · United States v. Del Muro
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We are mindful that district courts face competing considerations in deciding whether it is appropriate to inquire into the merits of [ineffective assistance] claims prior to judgment, including ... the ... disruption of the proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]hen a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is first raised in the district court prior to the judgment of conviction, the district court may, and at times should, consider the claim at that point in the proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“where the record is sufficiently developed to permit review and determination of the issue, or the legal representation is so inadequate that it obviously denies a defendant his Sixth Amendment right to counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.