James v. Ryan’s Empirical Analysis
733 F.3d 911 · 2013
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Giglio v. United States · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · Harrington v. Richter · McNeill v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“explicit explanation of its own decision,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The presumption may be overcome when there is reason to think some other explanation for the state court's decision is more likely.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in the absence of any indication or state-law procedural principles to the contrary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.