Rollins v. Leonardo’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Oregon v. Elstad · Harris v. Reed · Drope v. Missouri · Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Newman Oil Co. · Wrenn v. McFadden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a matter of record before the Appellate Court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rollins v. Leonardo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.