Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 733 NE2D 932 - In Re Thonert

In Re Thonert’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
August 2002
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Snowe v. State · Fletcher v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “By failing to advise his client of a ruling in the controlling jurisdiction that was adverse to the legal arguments contemplated for his client's ... appeal, and instead choosing only to advise the client of an earlier appellate decision favorable to his position, [Thonert] effectively divested his client of the opportunity to assess intelligently the legal environment in which his case would be argued and [impeded his client's ability] to make informed decisions regarding whether to go forward with [the appeall.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the [defendant] to make informed decisions”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.