Mills v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dilworth v. State · Bowen v. State · Black v. State · Cortez v. State · Kelly v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we held that if a prosecutor threatens a defense witness with future charges by virtue of the witness' testimony, and the witness then refuses to testify, the defendant has been deprived of his right to present witnesses, and reversal of the conviction is required.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. ASHTON v. STATE“[T]he immunity provision contained in Art. II, § 27 of the Oklahoma Constitution [] extends the privilege only to witnesses testifying for the State.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McNEELY v. STATE
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.