Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 733 SO2D 1000 - Snipes v. State

Snipes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably 830 So. 2d 792 - Pagan v. State (2002), 739 So. 2d 568 - Ramirez v. State (1999)

28 state decisions

190199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Colorado v. Connelly · Fare v. Michael C. · 322 So. 2d 908 - Tedder v. State · 615 So. 2d 688 - Spencer v. State · 714 So. 2d 411 - Urbin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “was sexually abused for a number of years as a child, [and] he abused drugs and alcohol beginning at a young age.... He was raised in a dysfunctional, alcoholic family, [and] suffered childhood trauma.... He also suffers emotional stress and a personality disorder due to his early childhood. Importantly, Snipes voluntarily confessed to the crime and told others about it, he expressed remorse, and the State depended upon Snipes' statements to obtain a conviction against him and a warrant against a codefendant. Additionally, the crime was arranged by older individuals, and testimony reflected that Snipes was easily led by older persons.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the defendant in Bonifay had admitted involvement in several prior crimes, one of which was a prior burglary in which someone was stabbed several months prior to the murder. Further, not only was the defendant in Bonifay hired to commit the murder; when the murder actually occurred, Bonifay callously killed the wrong person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “defendant's age of seventeen was particularly compelling when coupled with the substantial impairment [e.g., drug and alcohol abuse, dyslexia, employment history] and family neglect [e.g., lack of a father].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.