Corpuz v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 559 So. 2d 187 - State v. Law · Stewart v. State · 705 So. 2d 90 - Dupree v. State · 725 So. 2d 1105 - Zellars v. State · 395 So. 2d 1175 - Pressley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“By the motion, a defendant admits all facts introduced into evidence and the court must draw every inference favorable to the prosecution. The question of whether the evidence fails to exclude all reasonable hypotheses of innocence is for the jury to determine, and where there is substantial, competent evidence to support the jury verdict, we will not reverse.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Maglio v. State“a defendant admits all facts introduced into evidence and the court must draw every inference favorable to the prosecution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.