Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 733 SO2D 1074 - State v. Parker

State v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2000
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Herrin v. State · State v. Gordon · 715 So. 2d 298 - State v. Bostick · 698 So. 2d 647 - State v. Hill · 659 So. 2d 328 - State v. Porter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... Minimally, this requires proof of some facts indicating a defendant has the potential to reverse his or her prior life of addiction, and is sincere in the desire to do so. Something more than a defendant's perfunctory statement that he or she is a fit subject to rehabilitation is needed. [citations omitted].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.