733 So. 2d 1282 - State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Horton v. California · Logiudice v. Georgia · United States v. Security Industrial Bank · 441 So. 2d 1195 - State v. Belton · National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Claiborne Hardware Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In State v. Page, 95-2401, p. 10 (La. App. 4 Cir. 8/21/96), 680 So.2d 700, 709 , this court discussed the warrantless entry into a protected area: There is a justified intrusion of a protected area if there is probable cause to arrest and exigent circumstances. State v. Rudolph, 369 So.2d 1320, 1326 (La.1979), cert. den., Rudolph v. Louisiana, 454 U.S. 1142 , 102 S.Ct. 1001 , 71 L.Ed.2d 294 (1982). Exigent circumstances are exceptional circumstances which, when coupled with probable cause, justify an entry into a "protected" area that, without those exceptional circumstances, would be unlawful. Examples of exigent circumstances have been found to be escape of the defendant, avoidance of a possible violent confrontation that could cause injury to the officers and the public, and the destruction of evidence. State v. Hathaway, 411 So.2d 1074, 1079 (La.1982). See also State v. Julian, XXXX-XXXX (La. App. 4 Cir. 3/4/01), 785 So.2d 872 ; writ den. XXXX-XXXX (La.3/22/01), 8111 So.2d 920 ; State v. Brown, 99-0640 (La.App. 4 Cir. 5/26/99) , 733 So.2d 1282 .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.