733 So. 2d 159 - State ex rel. S.M.’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2002
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 719 So. 2d 445 - State, in Interest of Sm · State, in the Interest Jm · Biggs v. Prewitt · 558 So. 2d 806 - State in Interest of CD · 702 So. 2d 45 - State, in Interest of Jm
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“C. Under Article 1015(5), lack of parental compliance with a case plan may be evidenced by one or more of the following: (1) The parent’s failure to attend court-approved scheduled visitations with the child. (2) The parent’s failure to communicate with the child. (3) The parent’s failure to keep the department apprised of the parent’s whereabouts and significant changes affecting the parent’s ability to comply with the case plan for services. (4) The parent’s failure to contribute to the costs of the child’s foster care, if ordered to do so by the court when approving the case plan. (5) The parent’s repeated failure to comply with the required program of treatment and rehabilitation services provided in the case plan. (6) The parent’s lack of substantial improvement in redressing the problems preventing reunification. (7) The persistence of conditions that led to removal or similar potentially harmful conditions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State ex rel. D.A.G.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.