Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 733 SO2D 33 - State v. Drake

State v. Drake’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2005
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chambers v. Maroney · Berkemer v. McCarty · Nix v. Williams · Minnesota v. Dickerson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen, as here, the evidence in question would inevitably have been discovered without reference to the police error or misconduct, there is no nexus sufficient to provide a taint and the evidence is admissible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.