Robinson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2011
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 667 So. 2d 1242 - Ballenger v. State · 604 So. 2d 271 - Wells v. State · Dancer v. State · Butler v. State · 711 So. 2d 450 - Rushing v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) General Provision. The requirement of authentication or identification as a condition precedent to admissibility is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Testimony that a particular material is a controlled substance is of no relevance unless the State also proves the defendant's connection to that particular substance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The often-stated general rule is that wide latitude is given attorneys in making closing arguments.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.