733 So. 2d 484 - Henderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2010
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rees v. Peyton · Kalan Inc. v. United States · Gilmore v. Utah · Tafero v. Dugger · Henderson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Competency to forego further legal proceedings depends on whether the person whose competency is in question “has capacity to appreciate his position and make a rational choice with respect to continuing or abandoning further litigation or on the other hand whether he is suffering from a mental disease, disorder, or defect which may substantially affect his capacity in the premises.” '”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We note that the affidavit was never presented to the circuit court and that it is not a part of the record on the proceedings below or this record on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“And no one has threatened you, coerced you, made promises or tricked you into making this decision that you have told us about today?” ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.