State v. Haddad’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 2000
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sullivan v. Louisiana · Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California · Carter v. Kentucky · Lego v. Twomey · 484 So. 2d 122 - State v. Fraser
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“You must determine the facts only from the evidence presented. The evidence which you should consider consists of the testimony of witnesses and any other evidence which the Court has permitted the parties to introduce. You are not bound to decide any issue of fact in accordance with the number of witnesses presented on that point. Witnesses are weighed and not counted. The test is no which side brings the greater number of witnesses before you, or presents the greater quantity of evidence, but rather which witnesses and which evidence appeals to your minds as being the most convincing. The defendant is not required by law to call any witnesses or produce any evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.