Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 734 F.2d 149 - Vosch v. Werner Continental, Inc.

Vosch v. Werner Continental, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

734 F.2d 149 · 1984

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
October 2004
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently October 2004 · most notably Bacashihua v. United States Postal Service (1988), Anderson Ga No La Tj Dw Jj Wj Ww Cr Tw Pg v. Norfolk and Western Railway Company (1985)

8 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

170198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 216 · 49 U.S.C. § 11708 · 49 U.S.C. § 304 · 49 U.S.C. § 329

Relies on Vaca v. Sipes · United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co. · Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn. · Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc. · Smith v. Evening News Assn.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not challenge the fairness or adequacy of his union's representation in the arbitration process, nor [did] they impugn the integrity of the arbitration process.” Vosch, 734 F.2d at 154 . Instead, plaintiffs simply were”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if they can show that their union breached its duty of fair representation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.