Jenkins v. McDermott, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
734 F.2d 229 · 1984
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 33 U.S.C. § 901 · 33 U.S.C. § 902 · 33 U.S.C. § 903 · 33 U.S.C. § 905
Relies on Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. Caputo · Kilcullen v. United States · Calbeck v. Travelers Insurance Co. · Sun Ship, Inc. v. Pennsylvania · Lowe v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, A Division of Litton Systems, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“), cannot survive a rejection of the state act's coverage and the election, instead, of the federal remedy.... As we indicated in a somewhat similar context,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the legislatively intended uniformity of treatment of maritime and amphibious workers, regardless of situs”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“differing remedies would be provided to workmen injured in the performance of the identical”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.