Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 734 F.2d 519 - Reeves v. Heckler

Reeves v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis

734 F.2d 519 · 1984

Citation profile

134
cited by 134 later decisions
November 2021
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 134 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably Walker v. Bowen (1987), Tucker v. Heckler (1985)

33 federal appellate · 1 district ·

73019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · Kirk v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Wiggins v. Schweiker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 134 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is reversible error for an ALJ not to order a consultative examination when such an evaluation is necessary for him to make an informed decision.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'the claimant's ability to adapt to a new work environment is less than the level established under the grids for persons his age.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[c]ombined, the claimant's impairments can be expected to limit him to at least a wide range of sedentary work activities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.