Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 734 F.2d 701 - Wolfe v. Chrysler Corp.

Wolfe v. Chrysler Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

734 F.2d 701 · 1984

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
August 2012
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2012

5 federal appellate ·

401984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sweat v. Miller Brewing Co. · 82 Ga. App. 779 - Studebaker Corporation v. Nail · 139 Ga. App. 697 - UIV CORP. v. Oswald · 154 Ga. App. 127 - Tolar Construction Co. v. GAF Corp. · 123 Ga. App. 679 - Rustin Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Kendricks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under Georgia law, the elements of a cause of action for fraud are (1) a false representation made by the defendant; (2) scienter, or knowledge of the statement’s falsity at the time the statement was made; (3) an intention to induce the plaintiff to act or refrain from acting in reliance on the statement; (4) the plaintiff’s justifiable reliance; and (5) damage to the plaintiff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.