Schwalier v. Hagel’s Empirical Analysis
734 F.3d 1218 · 2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Relies on Smalls v. United States · Vietnam Veterans of America v. Secretary of the Navy · Kidwell v. Department of the Army · Drasek v. Lehman · Sharp v. Weinberger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“look only to the essence of a complaint in the absence of an explicit request for monetary relief.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“To permit plaintiffs to evade the strictures of the Tucker Act by setting forth the formula for their monetary relief rather than asking for a specified amount of 'damages' in so many words would undo the carefully erected structure that Congress set forth.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.