Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 734 F.3d 288 - Radford v. Colvin

Radford v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis

734 F.3d 288 · 2013

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Bowen v. Yuckert · Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion · Bowen v. City of New York · Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he record should include a discussion of which evidence the ALJ found credible and why, and specific application of the pertinent legal requirements to the record evidence.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[the] inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) worked during the purported period of disability; (2) has an impairment that is appropriately severe and meets the duration requirement; (3) has an impairment that meets or equals the requirements of a ‘listed’ impairment and meets the duration requirement; (4) can return to her past relevant work; and (5) if not, can perform any other work in the national economy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.