Guerrero v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
734 F.3d 45 · 2013
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (§ 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Elysee v. Gonzales · Ayeni v. Holder · Parzagonis v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · G-D-M · Restrepo v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“By choosing to seek entry into the United States as a crewman, [the plaintiff] agreed to the limitations associated with that status. Therefore, he cannot now avoid the consequences of those restrictions ... by claiming not to be a crewman.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he record supports the BIA's finding that the circumstances surrounding [the plaintiff's] entry indicate that he entered the United States intending to work as a crewman, and pursuing employment as such”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a person serving in any capacity on board a vessel or aircraft.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.