Cantarero v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
734 F.3d 82 · 2013
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Immigration and Naturalization Service, v. Juan Anibal Aguirre-Aguirre · Fatin v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · ACOSTA
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he BIA reasonably concluded that . . . Congress did not mean to grant asylum to those whose association with a criminal syndicate has caused them to run into danger”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“based on a 'permissible construction of the statute.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[b]ecause we are confronted with a question implicating 'an agency's construction of the statute which it administers,' we follow Chevron principles in our review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Chavez v. Garland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.