Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 734 FSUPP 99 - McGuire v. Switzer

McGuire v. Switzer’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2014

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

140199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975) · 28 U.S.C. § 1337 · 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 29 U.S.C. § 701 (Employment Opportunities for Individuals With Disabilities Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 706 · 29 U.S.C. § 721 · 29 U.S.C. § 722 · 29 U.S.C. § 731

Relies on Anderson v. Creighton · Edelman v. Jordan · Goldberg v. Kelly · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Will v. Michigan Department of State Police

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether this analysis [that used in Wilson and Goodman ] should be extended beyond the Reconstruction Acts and laws forbidding racial discrimination to statutes like § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, remains an open question. Goodman , however, in characterizing discrimination claims as a “fundamental injury to the individual rights of a person” and thus akin to personal injury actions, seems to suggest an affirmative answer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.