734 F. Supp. 2d 172 - Doucot v. IDS Scheer, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · St Paul Mercury Indemnity Co v. Red Cab Co · Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co. · Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“precludes either side from the usual status of 'prevailing party.' "). The key issues remain undecided as they are based on disputed facts. Thus, after pouring through the extensive summary judgment record, this court cannot yet conclude whether Rigaku's extended document production constituted a material breach of the contract, or whether Formulatrix's reaction to Rigaku's production was justified or constituted a violation of Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 93A. Thus, "this court awaits the final adjudication on the merits before it will entertain requests for attorneys' fees.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a collateral matter to be determined following adjudication of the relevant claims”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.