Rohrer v. Rohrer’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dusenberry v. Dusenberry · Hubbard v. Hubbard · Haskell v. Peterson Pontiac GMC Trucks · Capehart v. Capehart · Moore v. Moore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the judgment or findings are either against the weight of the evidence, or are not supported by or contrary to the evidence; (2) special findings of fact required by this rule are lacking, incomplete, inadequate in form or content or do not cover the issues raised by the pleadings or evidence; (3) special findings of fact required by this rule are inconsistent with each other; or (4)the judgment is inconsistent with the special findings of fact required by this rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.