Grubb v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Minnesota v. Murphy · Wright v. Wright · Insurance Co. of North America v. United States Department of Labor · Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. M Scott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to protect the privilege against self-incrimination, the United States Supreme Court held in Miranda v. Arizona that incriminating statements made while the defendant is in custody and subject to interrogation may not be admitted into evidence unless the defendant waives his Fifth Amendment privilege after being warned of his right to remain silent and the consequences of his failure to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brabandt v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.