Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 734 P2D 980 - Britt v. State

Britt v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
8
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 2017

11 state decisions

601987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Stern · State v. Luna · Evanson v. State · Oakley v. State · State v. Romero

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[u]nder the circumstances of this case, however, there is no significant difference between being in possession and being armed”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Arguably, under some circumstances (not present here), it might be appropriate to make a distinction between being in possession and being armed with a deadly weapon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “certainly tends to escalate a dangerous situation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.